William and Mary Law Review Revenue and Competitors
Estimated Revenue & Valuation
- William and Mary Law Review's estimated annual revenue is currently $7.5M per year.
- William and Mary Law Review's estimated revenue per employee is $105,634
Employee Data
- William and Mary Law Review has 71 Employees.
- William and Mary Law Review grew their employee count by 6% last year.
William and Mary Law Review's People
Name | Title | Email/Phone |
---|
William and Mary Law Review Competitors & AlternativesAdd Company
Competitor Name | Revenue | Number of Employees | Employee Growth | Total Funding | Valuation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | $15M | 132 | 7% | N/A | N/A |
#2 | N/A | 45 | 10% | N/A | N/A |
#3 | $7.5M | 71 | 6% | N/A | N/A |
#4 | N/A | 34 | 6% | N/A | N/A |
#5 | N/A | 32 | 23% | N/A | N/A |
#6 | $3.5M | 81 | 5% | N/A | N/A |
#7 | N/A | 1 | 0% | N/A | N/A |
What Is William and Mary Law Review?
Since 1957, the William and Mary Law Review has published important scholarly work and has become one of the top general interest law journals in the country. Published six times per year—in October, November, February, March, April, and May—the Review has featured the work of noted scholars in all areas of the law. During the last decade, state and federal courts, including the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and D.C. Circuit Courts of Appeal, have cited the William & Mary Law Review more than four hundred times. This summer, Justice Alito cited to the William & Mary Law Review in his majority opinion in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, 140 S. Ct. 2049, 2060 (2020). Earlier this year, Justice Thomas cited to the Review in his concurrence, joined by Justices Alito and Gorsuch, in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, 140 S. Ct. 2246, 2264 (2020) (Thomas, J., concurring) and in his dissent in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2231 (2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). Last year, Chief Justice Roberts cited the Review in his majority opinion in Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 2161, 2178 (2020), and Justice Kagan cited the Review in her dissent in that case, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor. Justice Alito cited to the Review in his opinion in American Legion v. American Humanist Association, 139 S. Ct. 2067, 2081 (2019). In 2018, Justice Ginsberg cited the Review in her dissent in Epic Systems Corporation v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612, 1647 (2018) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting), which was joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. In 2017, Justice Ginsburg cited the Review twice in her majority opinion in Microsoft Corporation v. Baker, 137 S. Ct. 1702, 1709, 1714 (2017).
keywords:N/AN/A
Total Funding
71
Number of Employees
$7.5M
Revenue (est)
6%
Employee Growth %
N/A
Valuation
N/A
Accelerator
William and Mary Law Review News
PRINCE Harry's frustrations reached a level that forced him to seek out his ex-girlfriend to complain about the Royals, an expert has claimed.Author o.
Prince William was a holy terror as a toddler. In fact, even Queen Elizabeth complained to Prince Philip that their grandson was out of...
Kate Middleton has also had to mediate a few rows between Prince Charles and Prince William, a new book claims.
Company Name | Revenue | Number of Employees | Employee Growth | Total Funding |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | $17.3M | 71 | 31% | N/A |
#2 | $16.5M | 72 | 9% | N/A |
#3 | $13.7M | 76 | 19% | N/A |
#4 | $22.3M | 77 | 5% | N/A |
#5 | $21.3M | 79 | 10% | N/A |