Umatilla Electric Cooperative Revenue and Competitors

Hermiston, OR USA

Location

N/A

Total Funding

Utilities

Industry

Estimated Revenue & Valuation

  • Umatilla Electric Cooperative's estimated annual revenue is currently $22M per year.(i)
  • Umatilla Electric Cooperative's estimated revenue per employee is $220,000

Employee Data

  • Umatilla Electric Cooperative has 100 Employees.(i)
  • Umatilla Electric Cooperative grew their employee count by 2% last year.

Umatilla Electric Cooperative's People

NameTitleEmail/Phone
1
VP Power SupplyReveal Email/Phone
2
VP, Finance and RatesReveal Email/Phone
3
VP, Engineering & OperationsReveal Email/Phone
4
VP AdministrationReveal Email/Phone
5
IT ManagerReveal Email/Phone
6
Project Manager at Umatilla Electric CooperativeReveal Email/Phone
7
Manager Public RelationsReveal Email/Phone
8
System AdministratorReveal Email/Phone
9
Power System OperatorReveal Email/Phone
10
Executive Assistant to CEOReveal Email/Phone
Competitor NameRevenueNumber of EmployeesEmployee GrowthTotal FundingValuation
#1
$151.3M5507%N/AN/A
#2
$3.1M2011%N/AN/A
#3
$18.7M854%N/AN/A
#4
$1086M35262%N/AN/A
#5
$8.6M49-29%N/AN/A
#6
$54.5M2256%N/AN/A
#7
$23.1M105-4%N/AN/A
#8
$11.7M597%N/AN/A
#9
$22M1002%N/AN/A
#10
$20M916%N/AN/A
Add Company

What Is Umatilla Electric Cooperative?

Anyone in his golden years who was raised in rural America just might remember life without kilowatt-hours. Rural electric consumers can thank President Franklin D. Roosevelt for signing into law the Rural Electrification Act in 1935. The Act, part of the New Deal, established the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) to make funds available for consumer groups to establish cooperative electric utilities. The 'for profit' electric utilities had determined the metropolitan boundaries they wished to serve. Those private utilities decided against extending their lines into the rural areas, unless the consumer paid for the entire extension. Profit-minded utilities considered the low population density and apparent limited potential consumption a poor investment, and concluded that it was cost-prohibitive for investor-owned utilities to serve the rural areas.

keywords:N/A

N/A

Total Funding

100

Number of Employees

$22M

Revenue (est)

2%

Employee Growth %

N/A

Valuation

N/A

Accelerator

Company NameRevenueNumber of EmployeesEmployee GrowthTotal Funding
#1
$18.8M12111%N/A
#2
$85.5M2887%N/A
#3
$76.3M33919%N/A