Umatilla Electric Cooperative Revenue and Competitors
Estimated Revenue & Valuation
- Umatilla Electric Cooperative's estimated annual revenue is currently $22M per year.
- Umatilla Electric Cooperative's estimated revenue per employee is $220,000
Employee Data
- Umatilla Electric Cooperative has 100 Employees.
- Umatilla Electric Cooperative grew their employee count by 2% last year.
Umatilla Electric Cooperative's People
Name | Title | Email/Phone |
---|---|---|
1 | VP Power Supply | Reveal Email/Phone |
2 | VP, Finance and Rates | Reveal Email/Phone |
3 | VP, Engineering & Operations | Reveal Email/Phone |
4 | VP Administration | Reveal Email/Phone |
5 | IT Manager | Reveal Email/Phone |
6 | Project Manager at Umatilla Electric Cooperative | Reveal Email/Phone |
7 | Manager Public Relations | Reveal Email/Phone |
8 | System Administrator | Reveal Email/Phone |
9 | Power System Operator | Reveal Email/Phone |
10 | Executive Assistant to CEO | Reveal Email/Phone |
Umatilla Electric Cooperative Competitors & AlternativesAdd Company
Competitor Name | Revenue | Number of Employees | Employee Growth | Total Funding | Valuation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | $151.3M | 550 | 7% | N/A | N/A |
#2 | $3.1M | 20 | 11% | N/A | N/A |
#3 | $18.7M | 85 | 4% | N/A | N/A |
#4 | $1086M | 3526 | 2% | N/A | N/A |
#5 | $8.6M | 49 | -29% | N/A | N/A |
#6 | $54.5M | 225 | 6% | N/A | N/A |
#7 | $23.1M | 105 | -4% | N/A | N/A |
#8 | $11.7M | 59 | 7% | N/A | N/A |
#9 | $22M | 100 | 2% | N/A | N/A |
#10 | $20M | 91 | 6% | N/A | N/A |
What Is Umatilla Electric Cooperative?
Anyone in his golden years who was raised in rural America just might remember life without kilowatt-hours. Rural electric consumers can thank President Franklin D. Roosevelt for signing into law the Rural Electrification Act in 1935. The Act, part of the New Deal, established the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) to make funds available for consumer groups to establish cooperative electric utilities. The 'for profit' electric utilities had determined the metropolitan boundaries they wished to serve. Those private utilities decided against extending their lines into the rural areas, unless the consumer paid for the entire extension. Profit-minded utilities considered the low population density and apparent limited potential consumption a poor investment, and concluded that it was cost-prohibitive for investor-owned utilities to serve the rural areas.
keywords:N/AN/A
Total Funding
100
Number of Employees
$22M
Revenue (est)
2%
Employee Growth %
N/A
Valuation
N/A
Accelerator
Company Name | Revenue | Number of Employees | Employee Growth | Total Funding |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | $18.8M | 121 | 11% | N/A |
#2 | $85.5M | 288 | 7% | N/A |
#3 | $76.3M | 339 | 19% | N/A |