SGNL Revenue and Competitors
Employee Data
- SGNL has 47 Employees.
- SGNL grew their employee count by 12% last year.
SGNL's People
Name | Title | Email/Phone |
---|
SGNL Competitors & AlternativesAdd Company
Competitor Name | Revenue | Number of Employees | Employee Growth | Total Funding | Valuation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | $491M | 2505 | 10% | N/A | N/A |
#2 | $0.4M | 12 | -25% | $10M | N/A |
#3 | $2.1M | 12 | -52% | N/A | N/A |
#4 | $3.6M | 30 | 43% | N/A | N/A |
#5 | N/A | 10 | 43% | N/A | N/A |
#6 | $28M | 159 | 1% | N/A | N/A |
#7 | N/A | 43 | 153% | N/A | N/A |
#8 | $5.1M | 40 | -22% | N/A | N/A |
#9 | $15.8M | 99 | 34% | N/A | N/A |
#10 | N/A | 11 | 450% | N/A | N/A |
What Is SGNL?
SGNL’s modern privileged identity management system eliminates standing access to critical systems, granting and revoking contextual access in real-time, drastically reducing the blast radius of a possible breach. Regardless of how an identity breach infiltrates your workforce, SGNL brings in context-based intelligence and prevents them from freely navigating cloud applications like Azure, AWS, GitHub, and Salesforce, as well as on-prem systems.\nIn today’s era of persistent identity attacks, high-risk standing access is a serious threat to critical enterprise systems. Traditional IGA, RBAC, and PAM approaches fall short because they simply weren’t designed for today’s identity-centric security perimeter. SGNL’s dynamic approach to access management achieves Zero Standing Privilege across your cloud applications like Azure, AWS, GitHub, and Salesforce, as well as on-prem systems.\nIt’s why global enterprises and fast-growing mid-market companies alike are turning to SGNL to reduce their identity attack surfaces, and why SGNL is backed by top security technology investors including Cisco and Microsoft.
keywords:N/AN/A
Total Funding
47
Number of Employees
N/A
Revenue (est)
12%
Employee Growth %
N/A
Valuation
N/A
Accelerator
Company Name | Revenue | Number of Employees | Employee Growth | Total Funding |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | $16M | 47 | -55% | $82.3M |
#2 | $9.3M | 48 | 30% | N/A |
#3 | $5.6M | 48 | 26% | N/A |
#4 | $11.9M | 48 | -27% | N/A |
#5 | $9.9M | 49 | -2% | N/A |