Nuvolat Cloud Group Competitors, Revenue, Alternatives and Pricing
Estimated Revenue & Financials
- Nuvolat Cloud Group's estimated annual revenue is currently $37.6M per year.
- Nuvolat Cloud Group's estimated revenue per employee is $145,000
- Nuvolat Cloud Group has 259 Employees.
- Nuvolat Cloud Group grew their employee count by 3% last year.
- Nuvolat Cloud Group currently has 1 job openings.
|Competitor Name||Revenue||Number of Employees||Employee Growth||Total Funding||Online Review||Pricing|
What Is Nuvolat Cloud Group?
Nuvolat® brings together leading experts from the world of cloud, datacenter and IT services. We are leading cloud hosting, infrastructure and cloud service providers. Presently have around 200 partners Worldwide and over 200 employees in US | India. Our mission is to help our partners provide a high quality enterprise cloud offering (like Rackspace) to their customers with greater profit margins. The Nuvolat® platform differs from other cloud builders by delivering numerous technology components with a simpler setup process and lower management overhead. Technology highlights include software components for integrated redundant storage that provide unlimited snapshotting, cloning, multi-hypervisor support, and integrated replication. Nuvolat®' executive management team and senior technical experts have an average of 15 years experience within datacenter and storage environments. Nuvolat® technology was developed to offer true utility computing by solving typical datacenter problems including labor-intensive processes, limited automation, and poor visibility. Innovators of successful datacenter technology, Nuvolat offers white labeled, enterprise Class cloud infrastructure that you can put your name on and reap upwards of 70% margins. Based on our robust, scalable and secure Cloud technology.keywords:N/A
Number of Employees
Employee Growth %
Nuvolat Cloud Group News
Sysadmin Blog I have set myself a mission to create a cloud this year. ... Unfortunately, Nuvolat does take a minimum buy-in, and I'd rather use ...